Resumo Fundamento: A caquexia cardíaca é um importante preditor de redução de sobrevida em pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca com fração de ejeção reduzida (ICFER). O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar os níveis de adropina e irisina em pacientes com ICFER caquéticos e não caquéticos, assim como a relação entre os níveis dessas proteínas e os parâmetros clínicos e laboratoriais nesses pacientes. Objetivos: Os objetivos do presente estudo foram avaliar os níveis de adropina e irisina em indivíduos caquéticos e não caquéticos e as relações entre os níveis dessas proteínas e os parâmetros clínicos e laboratoriais em pacientes com ICFEN. Métodos: Os prontuários de pacientes atendidos no ambulatório de cardiologia para ICFER foram triados. Aqueles com ICFER caquéticos foram identificados e constituíram o grupo de estudo (n = 44; idade média, 65,4 ± 11,2 anos; 61,4% de homens). Aqueles com ICFER e sem perda de peso foram arrolados como grupo controle (n = 42; idade média, 61,0 ± 16,5 anos; 64,3% de homens). Os níveis séricos de adropina e irisina de todos os pacientes foram medidos. Considerou-se significativo um p-valor < 0,05. Resultados: Os níveis séricos de adropina e irisina foram significativamente mais altos nos pacientes caquéticos do que nos controles [adropina (ng/l): 286,1 (231,3-404,0) vs 213,7 (203,1-251,3); p < 0,001; irisina (µg/ml): 2,6 (2,2-4,4) vs 2,1 (1,8-2,4); p = 0,001]. Os níveis séricos de adropina e irisina correlacionaram-se positivamente com os níveis de peptídeo natriurético cerebral (BNP) e a classe funcional da New York Heart Association (NYHA), e negativamente com o índice de massa corporal (IMC) e os níveis séricos de albumina (todos os p-valores: < 0,001). Na análise multivariada, a adropina foi o único preditor independente de caquexia nos pacientes com ICFER (OR: 1,021; IC 95%: 1,004−1,038; p = 0,017). Conclusões: Os resultados sugerem que a adropina e a irisina possam ser novos marcadores de caquexia cardíaca em pacientes com ICFER. Adropina e irisina estão relacionadas com a gravidade da insuficiência cardíaca.

Abstract Background: Cardiac cachexia is an important predictive factor of the reduction in survival of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Objectives: The aims of the present study were to evaluate adropin and irisin levels in cachectic and non-cachectic subjects and the relationships between the levels of these proteins and clinical and laboratory parameters in patients with HFrEF. Methods: The clinical records of patients who were admitted to the cardiology outpatient clinic for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction were screened. Cachectic patients were identified and assigned to the study group (n = 44, mean age, 65.4 ± 11.2 y; 61.4% men). Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients without weight loss were enrolled as the control group (n = 42, mean age, 61.0 ± 16.5 y; 64.3% men). The serum adropin and irisin levels of all patients were measured. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Serum adropin and irisin levels were significantly higher in the cachexia group than in the controls (Adropin (ng/L); 286.1 (231.3-404.0) vs 213.7 (203.1-251.3); p < 0.001, Irisin (µg/mL); 2.6 (2.2-4.4) vs 2.1 (1.8-2.4); p = 0.001). Serum adropin and irisin levels were positively correlated with brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and negatively correlated with body mass index (BMI) and serum albumin levels (all p values: < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis, adropin was the only independent predictor of cachexia in the heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients (OR: 1.021; 95% CI: 1.004−1.038; p = 0.017). Conclusions: The results suggest that adropin and irisin may be novel markers of cardiac cachexia in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients. Adropin and irisin are related with the severity of heart failure.

Objective Our aim was to investigate the thyroid function tests and thyroid volume differences among males with isolated hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (IHH) who take androgen replacement treatment (ART). Materials and methods Forty-four male with IHH with a mean age 33.2 (18-54), diagnosed in Endocrinology and Metabolism Department between September 2013 and September 2014 and 40 healthy male control with a mean age 27.77 (18-55) were involved to study. Patient group was divided to testosterone-treated patients (n = 19) and human chorionic gonadotropine (hCG)-treated patients (n = 25). Patient group was compared in terms of total testosterone, thyroid function tests [thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (fT4)] and thyroid volume, before and 6 months after treatment. Patient group was compared with control group as well. Results When we compared the patient group with the control group, there was no significant difference for age, Body mass index, TSH, fT4 and thyroid volume between two groups before treatment. There was no difference in terms of TSH, but fT4, testosterone levels and thyroid volume were significantly higher after treatment, when the patient group was compared before and after treatment (p < 0.05). When we compared testosterone-treated patients and hCG-treated patients; thyroid volume was higher among hCG-treated patients (p = 0.001) but there was no difference for thyroid volume before and after testosterone treatment (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant correlation between testosterone levels with TSH, fT4 and thyroid volume (r = 0.09, p = 0.32; r = 0.14, p = 0.11; r = 0.15, p = 0.09, respectively). Conclusion Our study showed that ART increases the thyroid volume especially in hCG-treated patients. Therefore, we suggest that thyroid volume changes should be followed up in hCG-treated patients.